LifestyleSports

Megan Rapinoe Shines Spotlight on Pay Fight and Unequal NCAA Amenities in Capitol Hill Testimony

The out World Cup champion also voiced her support for transgender athletes.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
In this Dec. 19, 2019, file photo, Megan Rapinoe, a forward with OL Reign and the U.S. women’s national team, attends a news conference in Tacoma, Wash (photo by AP Photo/Ted S. Warren).

World Cup champion, US soccer player and longtime equal pay advocate Megan Rapinoe highlighted the ongoing inequities and discrimination women face when it comes to compensation and sports as part of her testimony Wednesday before Congress.

“What we’ve learned, and what we continue to learn, is that there is no level of status — and there’s no accomplishment or power — that will protect you from the clutches of inequity,” Rapinoe said during a hearing in the House Oversight Committee meant to explore the systemic inequalities that have led to women to continue to be underpaid. “One cannot simply outperform inequality or be excellent enough to escape discrimination of any kind.”

Listing out the ways she and her teammates are still not treated on par with their male counterparts despite their numerous accolades on the world stage, Rapinoe said, “If it can happen to us, and it can happen to me, with the brightest light shining on us at all times, it can and it does happen to every person who is marginalized by gender.”

Rapinoe also spoke at the White House on Wednesday at an event hosted by the President and first lady to mark Equal Pay Day.

“I’ve helped, along with all of my teammates … win four World Cup championships and four Olympic gold medals for the United States. And despite those wins, I’ve been devalued, I’ve been disrespected and dismissed because I am a woman,” Rapinoe said.

Rapinoe said: “Despite all the wins, I’m still paid less than men who do the same job that I do.”

While appearing before Congress, Rapinoe also addressed how the NCAA has provided unequal amenities to the men and women’s basketball teams for their respective NCAA basketball tournaments, citing the instance as just the latest example of women receiving strikingly less resources than their male athletic colleagues.

“For an organization like the NCAA, similar to the US Soccer Federation, that’s a non-profit — it’s just absolutely unacceptable,” Rapinoe said. “For Mark Emmert and the executives at the NCAA, you just simply have to do better.”

Speaking more broadly about the need for more investment in female sports, Rapinoe said, “With the lack of proper investment we don’t know the real potential of women’s sports. What we know is how successful women’s sports have been in the face of discrimination, in the face of gender disparity, in the face of a lack of investment on virtually every single level.”

Rapinoe defends transgender athletes

At one point during the hearing, Rapinoe was asked by GOP Rep. Scott Franklin of Florida if she thought it put women at an unfair advantage to allow transgender women to participate in women’s sports.

“As a member of the LGBTQ community, I firmly stand with the trans family and that whole community. And as someone who has played sports with someone who is trans I can assure you all is well, nothing is spontaneously combusting,” Rapinoe said.

When pressed further by Franklin, Rapinoe stated, “I think that’s the reason that we want our kids to play sports is for all of the incredible aspects and character building and community building and self confidence building that happens in sports. And to completely cut out an entire section of people, I don’t think is appropriate.”

Republican freshman Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina asked Rapinoe why the US women’s soccer team is still pursuing higher wages if Rapinoe said she was satisfied with a previous collective bargaining settlement after a federal judge rejected the players’ claims that they were paid less than the men’s national team in their lawsuit.

“I think it’s much of an oversimplification, what you’re suggesting,” Rapinoe said to Mace. “And there’s many disparities within the men’s and the women’s team. And the overall pot of money is far larger, the overall available pot of money or possibility of the pot of money is much larger, for the men’s team. We earned close to them because we’re capturing nearly all of the pot of money available to us, whereas the men’s team is not.”

Covid-19 pandemic worsens pay inequities

Democrats leading the hearing sought to lay out how race has a disproportionate impact on a woman’s compensation, and highlighted how the coronavirus pandemic has only exacerbated the gender and racial inequalities that exist.

The United States Census Bureau announced in September 2020 that in 2019, the female-to-male earnings ratio was .823, a disparity that had remained stagnant from the previous year. That pay gap increases when examining compensation along racial lines: Hispanic women earned 58.7% of White non-Hispanic men and Black women earned 63.6% of White non-Hispanic men, according to 2020 data from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

The pandemic exacerbated the inequalities women experience in the work force even more dramatically. From February to April 2020, the unemployment rate for women rose roughly 12 percentage points whereas it only raised by 9 percentage points for men in that same period, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. And as the Brookings Institute highlighted, much of that job loss was the result of women becoming unemployed because of a lack of childcare, at twice the rate of men.

Most Republicans speaking at the hearing argued that adjusting for a variety of factors, including that women often work fewer hours and have more flexible schedules, makes the wage gap much smaller. They argued that legislation such as the Paycheck Fairness Act, which is supposed to create an equal wage, would ultimately lead to fixed pay scales that would hurt businesses.

GOP Rep. Pat Fallon of Texas argued that if the wage gap were real, business owners would hire women as their entire work force because it would save their bottom line.

“That doesn’t happen. And why? Because this alleged wage gap is grossly overstated and exaggerated for political benefit,” Fallon claimed.

Instead, Fallon laid out his belief that lawmakers should allow the free market to operate without government interference.

Fallon’s testimony sent shockwaves among Democrats and many testifying during the hearing.

“Oh my God,” Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia said. “What we just heard requires you to forget the blatant history of exclusion and discrimination and direction with respect to women’s careers.”

Chief Executive Officer of Institute for Women’s Policy Research Nicole Mason also responded to Fallon’s comments by saying, “We live in a market economy, but the market economy is not working for women, people of color, workers who are in sectors that are lower wage and lower earning.”

Even Mace, who admitted that she has seen gender discrimination throughout her career working in male dominated fields argued, “Once adjusted for hours worked and compensation packages, family, and marital status, the gender wage gap I believe is significantly smaller than what we’re talking about today.”

Despite Republican pushback throughout the hearing about the Paycheck Fairness Act, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Wednesday in her statement commemorating Equal Pay Day that the House would take up the legislation next month.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

Comments

CNN News

CNN News delivers the latest breaking news and information on the latest top stories, weather, business, entertainment, politics, and more.
Check Also
Close
Back to top button